ai.RECIST Project

Artificial Intelligence-Based Measurement of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Project

Can AI-based imaging tools improve tumor measurement? 

Visit us on LinkedIn and X to stay up to date with #aiRECIST.

Tumor response metrics are used to determine the efficacy of cancer therapies in solid tumor clinical trials. These measurements rely on standardized and unbiased criteria through the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) performed by expert human readers. RECIST-based assessments provide a systematic approach to objective tumor measurements at defined timepoints, but their implementation faces several challenges, including investigator bias, subjectivity in lesion selection, and variability in measurements across clinical sites and radiologists. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tumor measurement tools have the potential to address these challenges, reducing variability, increasing efficiency, and improving measurement accuracy.

  • Friends created a research partnership to evaluate AI-driven tumor measurement tools alongside human-reader RECIST assessments. 
  • Key objectives: 
    • Assess AI tool agreement – Can AI-based tools provide consistent tumor measurements?
    • Compare variability among AI tools and human assessments – How well do AI-driven measurements align with RECIST-based readings by human readers? 
    • Explore AI’s impact on efficiency – Can AI tools reduce variability and streamline clinical trials? 

Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) is used in clinical trials to ensure accurate tumor assessments. Regulators often require BICR to minimize bias by blinding human readers to patient and treatment details when evaluating imaging-based endpoints like progression-free survival and objective response rate. However, BICR is resource-intensive, potentially prolonging trial timelines, delaying treatment decisions, and increasing costs. These delays may limit patient access to new therapies and, in some cases, may require additional imaging or adjudication when discrepancies occur between local and central assessments. AI-driven tumor measurement tools have the potential to streamline this process by ensuring consistent, unbiased verification of local assessments, reducing review time, and improving trial efficiency without compromising data integrity. By enhancing the speed and reliability of tumor measurements, AI could accelerate clinical trial progress and improve patient access to effective treatments.

Project Timeline